tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8186125468393054446.post4092006531520516263..comments2023-05-29T08:05:12.368-07:00Comments on Eutychus: Did Jesus Have a Wife? A New Gnostic FragmentEutychushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04071386254682518917noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8186125468393054446.post-35416637976009511282015-02-25T23:49:59.839-08:002015-02-25T23:49:59.839-08:00How about this item reflecting the development of ...How about this item reflecting the development of the adoration of Mary, the mother? So Jesus, as God incarnate, is calling Mother Mary his wife. since they had a child. That suggests the whole piece would be a nasty satire about the God who dies to save us. They did that sort of thing in antiquity. Bob Qathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05067651103341111702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8186125468393054446.post-79444580004802342142013-12-17T20:20:42.009-08:002013-12-17T20:20:42.009-08:00The only way Jesus could have had a wife, is she w...The only way Jesus could have had a wife, is she would have had to be supernaturally conceived like Jesus was, or she would have had to come from one of his ribs like Eve came from Adams. The reason is. Jesus was made from perfect seed, and lived a sinless life,not from the imperfect seed of Adam, if he took a wife from the imperfect seed of Adam, and became one flesh with her, he would have beenAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11065044669652489247noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8186125468393054446.post-81821106653044252332013-12-16T19:10:08.171-08:002013-12-16T19:10:08.171-08:00The only way Jesus could have had a wife, is she w...The only way Jesus could have had a wife, is she would have had to be supernaturally conceived like Jesus was, or she would have had to come from one of his ribs like Eve came from Adams. The reason is. Jesus was made from perfect seed, and lived a sinless life,not from the imperfect seed of Adam, if he took a wife from the imperfect seed of Adam, and became one flesh with her, he would have beenAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11065044669652489247noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8186125468393054446.post-26932783135763662272013-02-22T22:22:36.223-08:002013-02-22T22:22:36.223-08:00Nice bloggerNice bloggervuhelphttp://www.vuhelp.net/grade-8/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8186125468393054446.post-90765881179063698542012-09-19T14:46:14.918-07:002012-09-19T14:46:14.918-07:00What this actually reveals is just one more tidbit...What this actually reveals is just one more tidbit how heterogenous the emerging Christianity was, how different views could be held up into the 4th century (because someone must have considered it valid then to copy a text written perhaps 150-200).<br /><br />Which shouldn't really surprise anyone, considering that the questions about Jesus' nature - fully or partly divine, had he Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com